THE UN IS COMMUNIST
WHAT IS BUSH?

By: Alan Stang

For weeks, we have been looking at the major American wars of the Twentieth Century, in order to provide a context of understanding for the present war on Iraq.  We have seen that, in behalf of their perennial goal of world government, our own leaders tricked us into both world wars by arranging for the murders of thousands of our own people.   The next war we need to look at is the war in Korea, and to understand the war in Korea we need to look first at the United Nations.

The war in Korea was the first war the United States fought in behalf of the UN, under UN direction, for UN purposes.  The present war on Iraq is another.   It is painfully obvious that President Bush wants the UN to serve as protective cover for Washington's purposes.  So, what is the UN?  The United Nations was conceived by Communists and has always been run by Communists for Communist purposes.

Remember that after World War I, the world government conspirators failed to arrange American entry into the League of Nations, which was then the rudimentary framework of the world government they were trying to create.  They inundated the American people with world government propaganda through conspiratorial outfits like the Council on Foreign Relations, with the result that they were successful in putting the United States into the United Nations after World War II.

The UN was founded at the San Francisco Conference in 1945, as the war was coming to an end.  The Secretary-General at the UN conference was a distinguished gentleman names Alger Hiss, movie star-handsome, endlessly efficient and consummately charming.  Hiss helped draft the UN Charter.  Without credentials signed by Alger Hiss, it was impossible to get into the conference.  In a historic news photo that probably appeared on the front page of every newspaper in the United States, President Harry S. Truman and Hiss are shown together on the dais.

As Director of the State Department's Office of Special Political Affairs, Hiss appointed the members of the U.S. delegation to the UN.  At the infamous Yalta Conference in the Soviet Union, in February, 1945, where much of this was arranged and where central Europe was secretly deeded to Stalin, Hiss stood at the dying Roosevelt's elbow.

There was only one problem.  Alger Hiss was later exposed as a Soviet spy; he was convicted of perjury and imprisoned for lying under oath about his Communist activities.   No doubt that was why, at the first London Conference in 1946, a couple of years before he was exposed, Hiss arranged for the Soviets to run UN military activities and for the United States to run UN financial activities, which meant in effect that the Soviet Union won the right to run the UN and we won the right to pay for it.  It is important to note that Alger Hiss was just one of many Soviet UN maggots.  How likely is it, do you think, that George W. Bush doesn't know all this?

Remember that the purpose of all this was and remains the creation of a world government, in which our own U.S. government would at first be subservient and later dissolved.   One of your Intrepid Correspondent's books could be helpful in this discussion.   In The Actor (Boston, Western Islands, 1968), you will find for instance the following statement published by Foreign Affairs, the monthly periodical of the Council on Foreign Relations.  John Foster Dulles, the Marxist revolutionary who was Eisenhower's Secretary of State, is talking here about UN legislation: ". . . The achievement of such a body of laws calls for a lawmaking process.  And to enforce them there is required. . . a judicial system and police force. . ."  So far, we haven't been able to arrange this, Dulles complains.  But then he adds, "We must not accept that condition as permanent. . . ."

Hmm.  Let's see.  A legislature.  A judiciary.  A military.   Wouldn't all that add up to a government?  How likely is it, do you think, that George W. Bush doesn't know all this?

Perhaps the best proof of what is happening comes from our own government.  If you have never heard of this before, you will probably not believe it.  The only thing we can suggest is that you take no one's word for it, including mine.  You can easily check it out for yourself.  It is very short; you could read the whole thing in a few minutes.

We are talking of course about the State Department Publication 7277, entitled Freedom From War, The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, released in September 1961, during the Kennedy Administration.  This was and remains official U.S. government policy: "The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order. . ."

Remember, we warned you.  Now, get up off the floor, find your bifocals and read it again.  It really does say what you thought it did, doesn't it?  Official U.S. government policy is to eliminate all militaries, including our own.  What would happen to those militaries?  Would they just be disbanded?  Would their arsenals just be destroyed?

No, Pilgrim.  They would be handed over to something called the United Nations Peace Force.  ". . . In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force. . ."

So, when the process is complete, we would be completely defenseless.  We would have no military, none at all.  The UN would have an invincible military, invincible because no nation could challenge it.  Right now, that lesson is being taught to Iraq, which will soon be disarmed.  Always the first target of such a Communist tactic is somebody everyone dislikes.

And the UN was conceived by Communists, was founded by Communists and always has been run by Communists for Communist purposes.  This would eventually mean the complete Communist subjugation of the United States.  Surely none of my very knowledgeable readers subscribes to the preposterous Communist canard that Communism is "dead."

Okay, maybe some Communist lunatic left over by the departing Alger Hiss wrote 7277.   But the date on the subversion is 1961, more than forty years ago, an eternity in this fast-moving world.  Maybe Jack Kennedy was too busy chasing Fiddle and Faddle in the White House to know about it in the first place.  And how do we know it is still U.S. government policy today?  Sorry, Pilgrim, we know it because once in a while we check on its status and it is still in force.  How likely is it , do you think, that George W. Bush doesn't know about this?

Bush lately has been calling for an ever-stronger UN, a UN with "spine," a UN with "backbone," a UN determined to avoid the fate of the League of Nations.   As we have seen, such a UN would mean world dictatorship.   To dramatize his commitment, Bush has put the United States back into UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, which the United States quit many years ago.

UNESCO was flooding the nation's schools with Communist world government propaganda.   That was one of its main purposes.  See the UN series entitled Toward World Understanding.  As always, read and decide for yourself.  UNESCO hasn't changed a jot, not even a tittle, but here we are in it again, thanks to George Bush.  Is the hair on the back of your neck standing up?  We're sorry, ladies.   Maybe you can work it into an exciting, new style.

Along these lines, UNICEF, the UN Children's Fund, has recently been pushing child sex with homosexuals and with animals.  In South Africa, a UNICEF outfit called LoveLife promotes sodomy and abortion.  Would the victims of such programs be black?

And in the issue of June 24th, 1997, the solidly leftist Village Voice, which calls itself America's largest weekly newspaper, reported in excruciating detail on sexual exploitation, torture and murder of children, by UN "Peacekeeping" soldiers, including photographs of UN goons literally burning a living child.  This story should have been on the front page of every newspaper in the United States.  Have you ever heard about it?  Does George W. Bush know?